The widespread use of mobile devices is known to create distance in social and family interactions rather than bringing people together. People may be physically in the same space, but their focus drifts elsewhere. This often leaves loved ones feeling distant, even when they are sitting right next to each other. For many, this is a daily struggle they might not even notice, as technology becomes a seamless extension of daily life.

Removed by Eric Pickersgill offers a striking visual solution to this issue. The photography series removes digital devices from portraits, capturing people frozen in the act of using tech without the devices actually present. In each photo, the absence of smartphones or tablets makes the loneliness and lack of direct communication startlingly apparent. The images prompt viewers to question their own routines and the effects of constant connectivity.

The Power of Removed’s Approach

Removed highlights the void left when technology mediates relationships, instead of supporting face-to-face connection. This visual experiment makes abstract feelings concrete, inviting people to imagine their own roles in similar scenarios. Major features of the project include large format portraits, emotional body language, and everyday settings—emphasizing how regularly this disconnection appears.

The series is accessible online, in a published artist book, and exhibited worldwide. It borrows familiar environments, helping viewers identify with the subjects. Visual storytelling is at the core, requiring no words to communicate the impact. Removed is a reminder to pause and engage more mindfully with others, both at home and in public spaces.

Pros of the Removed Project

One major advantage is its ability to communicate without needing technical explanation. Viewers instantly understand the message, making the project relatable and compelling. Removed also encourages conversations about technology’s place in our lives, which can foster healthier habits. The project’s versatility in both digital and physical formats ensures wide reach and impact.

Visually driven campaigns like this catch audience attention quickly and tend to linger in memory, promoting lasting behavioral changes. Removed’s simplicity helps reinforce a clear call for self-reflection around digital habits.

Cons of the Removed Project

The major downside is that the project only highlights the issue and doesn’t suggest actionable solutions directly. Some viewers may feel discomfort or defensiveness when confronted by the images. It may also mainly reach audiences already interested in art or digital culture critique, potentially missing less-engaged demographics.

Additionally, the concept may lose impact over time as it becomes familiar. But this challenge faces any artistic project aiming for broad cultural commentary.

Our Verdict

Removed by Eric Pickersgill uses beautiful, haunting photography to illuminate the emotional cost of device reliance. While the project does not prescribe changes, it plants seeds of awareness and care—an essential first step toward genuine reconnection. For anyone curious about their connection habits or seeking inspiration to shift away from digital dependence, exploring this series is thought-provoking and worthwhile.